this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
440 points (99.3% liked)

science

14323 readers
42 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

That doesn't sound like something we should be putting in our bodies then does it?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, the article, or I should I say ads with writing in between, says"potentially non-toxic". Which I find to be a highly troublesome qualifier.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

perhaps it’s worded that way for legal reasons? maybe if they flat out said it was non-toxic, and then it turned out that they were wrong, someone could sue them.

i am sure it’s the same sort of idea behind posting a video of someone committing a crime on camera, they use the word “allegedly”

dunno; not a lawyer

load more comments (2 replies)