this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
43 points (97.8% liked)
Civil Aviation
196 readers
1 users here now
News from civil commercial and noncommercial aviation, videos, discussions, and more.
Basic rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. No posts about military aviation
Avoid any and all posts related to military aviation.
3. No meme posts
No meme posts. Those should go to [email protected].
4. Instance rules apply
All lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.
founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think this is where the experts hang out but isn't it true that maintainers let these tires basically shred themselves to death before they change them out? Seems like this could just be a preventative maintenance problem and someone at the airline being irresponsible in approving required replacement.
Went to a museum that had historical army planes and a man there told me the tires on planes had to be changed after 100 flights from the wear and tear of landing. Not sure how much that’s changed from the early jets he was talking about, but certainly not an aspect of flight that I’d considered.
Once again, way to go Boeing.
As someone who has worked at a Tire and Brake shop for an airline, it is the airlines fault not Boeing. It’s not Ford’s fault if your Ford Explorer blows a tire 10 years into your ownership. Boeing is the dealer, airlines are the buyer/owner/maintainer. Only exception to this is if Boeing is specifically contracted for maintenance as is the case for the US government and military equipment.
Tires and brakes do have scheduled inspection periods, however you can get edge cases. I’ve changed tires that were ripped to shreds because the planes anti-skid system failed so several hundred thousand pounds of weight just got dragged across the pavement on an immovable block of rubber lmao.