this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
379 points (99.5% liked)

Work Reform

9857 readers
1 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 103 points 3 months ago (36 children)

Call me crazy, but all the various food delivery apps should be consolidated into one and run by the government. Make it part of the post office. It helps businesses, drivers would be paid fairly, and it provides an extremely useful public service.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (9 children)

If they operated under the government at a loss I think it's terrible policy. If it's ran as a for-profit then it'd be fine.

And of course make discounts for people that actually need the service (disabled people and such). But no way I'm paying for lazy 20 year olds that can walk across the street to pick their food themselves, but don't want to because the government service would be cheap.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The government isn’t a business. It’s a public service and I never hear anyone bitch about the wasteful spending when it comes to the military. I don’t understand why the post office is being treated like a for profit business.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Don't forget that the post office was profitable until it was purposefully sabotaged to be not be profitable

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

The government is not a business, but it has limited resources as everyone else.

If those resources are spent on delivery drivers, they're not spent in anything else. I'm not American, but if I were I would much rather those resources be spent on affordable healthcare for everyone than on food delivery for everyone.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (32 replies)