this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
47 points (96.1% liked)

Nintendo

18325 readers
1 users here now

A community for everything Nintendo. Games, news, discussions, stories etc.

Rules:

  1. No NSFW content.
  2. No hate speech or personal attacks.
  3. No ads / spamming / self-promotion / low effort posts / memes etc.
  4. No linking to, or sharing information about, hacks, ROMs or any illegal content. And no piracy talk. (Linking to emulators, or general mention / discussion of emulation topics is fine.)
  5. No console wars or PC elitism.
  6. Be a decent human (or a bot, we don't discriminate against bots... except in Point 7).
  7. All bots must have mod permission prior to implementation and must follow instance-wide rules. For lemmy.world bot rules click here

Upcoming First Party Games (NA):

Game | Date


|


The Legend of Zelda: Echoes of Wisdom | Sep 26 Super Mario Party Jamboree | Oct 17 Mario & Luigi: Brothership | Nov 7 Donkey Kong Country Returns HD | Jan 16, 2025 Metroid Prime 4 | 2025

Other Gaming Communities


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ideally, I'd like a game that would be good for logical thinking and appropriate for an 8 year old for a few years? Any ideas?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Pokemon requires you to understand type matching, so like water beats fire but fire beats grass type of thing, and there's plenty of numbers to get familiar with.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

When I was a kid and played pokemon, I had no clue about type matching. I just loaded up on xp on my first pokemon and called it a day.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I am a grown ass woman and that is exactly how I play lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Oh totally same. If you want a challenge where type matching actually matters, I’ve been recommended a particular crystal mod which makes the game way harder. I forget what its called though.

load more comments (1 replies)