Yes, but think of the profits.
Where are those profits going? Definitely not to you, that's for sure.
zephyreks
joined 1 year ago
The US is basically saying "we've seen all the evidence Canada has, but Canada is on its own because we don't want to piss off India. If India wants to cooperate, that would be great"
The Indian position on Sikhs is more radical than the Chinese position on Uyghurs. That's.... Depressing.
That's literally the role of the government, though.
US politics is basically neither side compromising on the basis of ideology and saying it's the other side's fault.
That's a far more condemnable position when you're the actual government than when you're the opposition.
Are people ignoring that Russia is substantially more populated than Ukraine? Ukraine isn't winning a war of attrition.
Fuck off. Your inconvenience is not worth more than their livelihoods.
Counterexample: police unions
Think of all the profits you're delivering to shareholders!
People have been far more concerned about the efficacy of the ALPS system at extracting other contaminants than they are about tritium contamination. The ALPS system is unproven and the wastewater they're releasing would be pretty toxic as far as other radioactive isotopes is concerned if the ALPS system isn't doing it's job perfectly.
Ah yes, because that usually leads to unanimous decisions in countries that are literally founded on the basis of preserving Islam.
You mean, African countries aren't happy about austerity measures under IMF loans? No way...