FizzyOrange

joined 1 year ago
[–] FizzyOrange 1 points 1 month ago

Yes I definitely am. It's really nice that crates.io is short, and it's silly to give that up for a miniscule risk of something moderately annoying happening.

Even if the domain goes away we'd just have to all move to a new domain. Annoying but hardly the end of the world. Cargo.io isn't actually hard-coded in many places. It's nothing like if github.com stopped existing.

[–] FizzyOrange 2 points 1 month ago

Oh wow I've been looking for something nice like that for ages. Python can do this and it's really great for silicon verification test stimulus. I've also done it in C++ using C++20 coroutines, but they are so complicated and low level I ended up having to use a library to help (libcoro). Felt like a bit of a gap in Rust, but this looks like a great solution!

[–] FizzyOrange 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There's zero chance they will get rid of .io.

[–] FizzyOrange 2 points 1 month ago

It's significantly less of a nightmare and Deno is downright pleasant.

[–] FizzyOrange 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The secret is just to do it anyway. I have yet to work in a job where anyone actively stopped me fixing technical debt, even if they never asked me to do it.

[–] FizzyOrange 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's cloud based though... Not ideal. I get why they had to do that (they didn't want to expose people to the Python infra shit show) but it's still kind of a shame.

Would be better if they added Typescript support IMO.

[–] FizzyOrange -3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You don't think Stonehawk is a better name than LibreWolf? Kind of proving my point there.

[–] FizzyOrange -2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

You obviously don't need those to come up with a good name; just some taste. Signal is a great example. Ladybird and Servo are good browser names if you want to stick to that. LibreWolf? Jesus, come on guys. Forgejo is another terrible name I heard recently. Apparently it's Esperanto, like that makes it ok somehow.

[–] FizzyOrange -1 points 1 month ago (17 children)

LibreWolf

Why are privacy/copyleft advocates so bad at naming?

[–] FizzyOrange 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're still missing the point. We all understand that definition. We're just saying that it is incorrect use of the word "concurrent". Does that make sense? The word "concurrent" means things happening at the same time. It's stupid for programmers to redefine it to mean things not happening at the same time.

[–] FizzyOrange 4 points 1 month ago

Does it work properly on Mac yet? Or does that depend on GTK4?

view more: ‹ prev next ›