CameronDev

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] CameronDev 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Family Link. You can whitelist apps, get screen time stats, and if your kid needs an app, when they try install it it will ask your approval.

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.google.android.apps.kids.familylink

Bit of a pain getting the accounts setup, but otherwise works very well for preventing my grandma filling her tablet with junk.

[–] CameronDev 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I think its better to keep your gateway basic, and run extra services on a separate raspi or similar. Let your router/gateway focus on routing packets.

[–] CameronDev 12 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Openwrt can run Adguard, and as long as your gateway can run docker, you can probably get pihole working.

[–] CameronDev 7 points 2 months ago

I'm not sure there is a "mentality of ephemeral code" in open source projects. The source is literally available on github or similar, and anyone can mirror it as they like.

If it is popular enough, then the project is probably backed up in the github artic vault as well.

[–] CameronDev 39 points 2 months ago

If its an open source project, the answer is to rebuild from the tagged source.

Eg: https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/tree/0.112.4

With the right repo setup, you can pip install git+https://github.com/fastapi/[email protected] (example only, not sure it works), so pypi doesn't need to keep all previous wheels, its just easier for it to do so.

[–] CameronDev 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Sure, except we are defenceless to the rampant dropbears. /s

Australia is a funny example for gun control. Yanks seem to think we have no guns at all, but the reality is that as long as you are mentally sound and store your guns safely, they aren't that hard to get.

[–] CameronDev 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Any idiot and chatgpt could knock up an overt always listening app in an afternoon. I have no doubt shady apps already can do this. Its not hard or expensive. (Backend storage and audio processing costs are a different kettle of fish, and I think those make this fairly prohibitive as well, but that's a funding problem, not a technical problem.)

But as soon as they make the claim that it doesn't trigger the microphone LED on iOS and Android, across all devices, then that's a "technically hard" problem. That's multiple zero days across multiple devices. Its just not feasable for an ad tech firm. They would never be able to recoup that investment.

I'm happy to be proven wrong, but so far all the researchers in the world have found nothing.

So I'm attributing near 0% chance that anyone outside of nation states have the later tech (device agnostic covert audio recording).

[–] CameronDev 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

The capabilities TLAs have costs hundreds of millions of dollars to develop, and once caught, are worthless. TLAs are extremely careful with their toys to avoid them being caught.

This Adtech company is claiming to have something at that level, which they are deploying everywhere. If it existed, it would have been found the day after they announced it, the security researcher industry would be all over it. They are very intelligent people who do understand those devices inside and out, if it existed they would find it. Remember, these are the same researchers who frequently out actual TLA tools.

You can't prove a negative, so it definitely is a probability thing, but I put the probability at basically 0 that they have what they claim.

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/12/no-a-marketing-firm-isnt-tapping-your-device-to-hear-private-conversations/

[–] CameronDev 1 points 2 months ago (6 children)

The capability they were claiming to have would make a three letter agency very excited. If they truely had the ability to listen to your microphone, transparently without notifying the user, they could sell that tech to every regime that wants to snoop on people, for millions of dollars.
Instead they claim to be using it for Ad-tech, where if it existed, would make it trivial to discover and flag as malware.

Apple and Google would also be very keen to find and squash whatever loophole let's them record without showing the notification.

Its just an extraordinary claim, which if true would have been exposed/validated by security researchers long ago.

[–] CameronDev 4 points 2 months ago

This is EE, we've yet to see Extinguish yet. This is kinda how APIs grow, see also: browser APIs.

Someone implements a new api, makes it usable. Other users can also implement or tweak, and later down the line it is standardised by a committee (or by defacto).

Extinguish is only really possible if you can add an API that your competitors cannot implement, either due to technical reasons or licencing. ActiveX was what did it for Browsers.

The fact that this API has been implemented means that Extinguish has not happened.

[–] CameronDev 10 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Not disputing the three letter agencies, but there is zero evidence that that ad company ever had the tech or ability. They were/are just full of shit.

view more: ‹ prev next ›