Wi-Fi jamming to knock out cameras suspected in nine Minnesota burglaries -- smart security systems vulnerable as tech becomes cheaper and easier to acquire : technology

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

This goes without saying but obviously the most secure will be analog. Unfortunately that is neither accessible or worth the time and trouble for the average consumer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Huh? If anything it would probably be even easier to jam.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Not if it's wired. But the same could probably be said for wired ip cameras

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] -3 points 9 months ago (7 children)

A couple of well trained dogs are better than cameras if you're serious about security.

load more comments (7 replies)

[–] [email protected] -5 points 9 months ago

The Flipper has become prolific in the crime world, apparently.

[+] [email protected] -7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Police need to have the tools to detect and locate the deployment of wireless jammers. People need more visibility over the electromagnetic spectrum. It's a pretty big tell when they begin to use them.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Acab

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Seems more like people want to defend their illegal use of wireless jammers than all cops are bastards to me.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I really don't give a flying fuck what you think. I just bought myself a flipper.

load more comments (1 replies)

[+] [email protected] -9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

Most likely 2.5g WiFi deauth. 5g fixes it and the companies just put 2.5g chips that are affected by this. Not that hard to use 5g chips.

Edit: Jamming Jamming is different. At that point use Ethernet

load more comments (4 replies)

Technology

Our Rules

Approved Bots