this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

Bicycles

3127 readers
31 users here now

Welcome to [email protected]

A place to share our love of all things with two wheels and pedals. This is an inclusive, non-judgemental community. All types of cyclists are accepted here; whether you're a commuter, a roadie, a MTB enthusiast, a fixie freak, a crusty xbiking hoarder, in the middle of an epic across-the-world bicycle tour, or any other type of cyclist!


Community Rules


Other cycling-related communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In Cambridge, MA, USA, and nearby communities, bike advocates have made real progress with lanes and paths and general infrastructure. Also the city requires that new builds have a proper bike room. This building was recently gutted and fitted out and this is the bike room today - overloaded, and the building is barely half full... Looks like they will need to find more efficient bike racks!

Meanwhile in a recent commute I was in a queue of 30 bicycles at a light at which about 6-8 cars get through at a time. 10-15 years ago I was one of the few bikes on the roads at any time.

Hats off to the advocates and representatives of the local cities that have made this happen through continuous pressure and work over decades...

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Man, and I can barely find a bike rack in my city that's actually bolted down... Jealous!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you not welcome our new bicycle overlords?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

no, it's the 21st century. It's fine to move forward toward Jetsonmobiles and transporters, not backwars to bikes.

In the mean time have you we've actually driven in a road? You have two options: (1.) stupid bicyclists who don't follow the rules, like not even showing down for stop signs, or (2.) stupid politicians who get rid of useful lanes to create protected bike lanes that are used near 0% of the time.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The future is in e-bikes. Keep retro-futurism out of reality.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

E-bikes have a great role to play but they are a solution alongside leg-powered bikes. While I'm happy to see how many people seem to have been attracted to bike transportation through e-bikes, I also see it as kind of absurd when able-bodied people feel that their 4-mile commute in our largely flat city needs an electric assist, and they couldn't imagine just getting a simple bicycle.

Given that I often pass e-bikes under leg power, I think masses of people hugely over-estimate the effort needed to cycle. Ironically, at least in my office, a lot of them are people who spend money and time then going to gyms to stay fit and healthy. One of the great things about a bike commute is it gives you exercise.

I like an assist for the hottest months (or if an area is hilly,) but in the Boston area, outside the hottest 2-3 months, I remove it in order to get a better amount of exercise in my life.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I am not interested in purity or commitment to some ideal, I'm interested in practicality. If we're talking about city cycling, an e-bike is just flat out more practical and flexible as a vehicle for more scenarios, uses, landscapes, and body types. But to be clear: I am not trying to convert cyclists to e-bikes, I'm interested in converting drivers out of cars. And to them, an ebike is a much much much easier sell.