this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
0 points (50.0% liked)

Bicycles

3127 readers
31 users here now

Welcome to [email protected]

A place to share our love of all things with two wheels and pedals. This is an inclusive, non-judgemental community. All types of cyclists are accepted here; whether you're a commuter, a roadie, a MTB enthusiast, a fixie freak, a crusty xbiking hoarder, in the middle of an epic across-the-world bicycle tour, or any other type of cyclist!


Community Rules


Other cycling-related communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is a really nifty school project, but… there are two crank arms, so the curve showing inefficiency is missing the second crank that would be present in the real world. And human legs aren’t pistons or simple weights.

The leg itself produces more or less oomph depending on the position of joints and what muscles are active at different positions, when muscles are stretched, slack, preloaded, etc. (Ever wonder why runners crouch just before the starting gun goes off? Or why even little kids flex forward at the hips when racing on bikes?)

The human leg “likes” to stride, pedals take advantage of the way the human leg works. Pistoning like a pogo stick works for mechanisms, but a human doing that is gonna end up as a patient in physical therapy with -at the very least- vicious knee pain from maximally loading the leg with the knee forward of the ball of the foot. (Remember your coach yelling at you to correct your squat form? Compare the “squat” at max load to the leg on a properly fitted crank bike vs on a piston mimic bike.)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Disappointing video in that there was no discussion at the end about the rider perseption, or performance. Without that, what was the point?

load more comments
view more: next ›