this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
89 points (91.6% liked)

PC Gaming

8660 readers
623 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sudoku 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It really makes no sense to call this "Half Life 2 RTX" when most of actual improvements are not RTX at all.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is made using Nvidia's RTX Studio, that is why it's called RTX.
It's also important to note that RTX is long past being just Nvidia's implementation of real time ray tracing, it is much bigger now as a suite of enhancements, technologies and tools.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In other words, it expanded into more of the same anti-competitive "only we get to do this" functionality as all their other features.

Only we do compute shaders! Oh ATI does compute shaders now? That's boring, only we do physics! Oh ATI does physics now? That's boring, only we do raytracing! Oh AMD does raytracing now? That's boring, only we do upscaling! Oh AMD does upscaling now? That's boring, only we do, uh, our exclusively branded nostalgia bait!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Only we do overprice! Oh AMD does overpricing now?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I despise the marketing for these projects with "RTX on" vs off when the entire scene is replaced with a much higher quality set of textures and models

[–] sudoku 1 points 1 year ago

yeah that trailer was horrible in this aspect

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would be cool to see it in a new game. One I haven’t played already.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why when you can capitalize on something that was already successful 20 years ago and exploit people's nostalgia.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The problem with ray tracing is that the most effective way to make it shine is on something hasn't shown potential with extra textures (like normal map) and PBR.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey Nvidia, how about you spend some time releasing some open source drivers instead of re-working some one else's already excellent software?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

oh they did.

they are just letting the community do their work for them now.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

So somebody discovered tesselation?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Or at least 69%

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] sudoku 1 points 1 year ago

it just works

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It looks better, sure, but marginally better, which is to say something as HL2 was released in 2004. I replayed it last year (the "update") and it still holds up so well: models and textures are old, sure, but animations, face animations in particular, barely show their age.

Anyway, this remake is apparently made by the same team that created the Portal: Prelude RTX mod, which (according to the Steam reviews) runs terribly. I wish I was more excited, but I can't say I am.