this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
495 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

59673 readers
3214 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 hours ago

Papers, please!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Obviously there are workarounds, but I suppose it provides a good justification for parents to deny their kids access to social media.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

China Video Game Ban v2.0: Electric Boogaloo

Parents should be parenting, not delegate their responsibilities to a nanny state.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

That would require us paying one parent enough to cover the other parent being a child care expert. But nobody gets to profit off of that so fuck society, everybody works, and nobody gets community goods except the wealthy.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 hours ago (11 children)

Solution is to fund a social safety net, not ban social media.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

if social media is fediverse, you're right; if social media is agents of surveillance capitalism, fuck social media

what's "social" about what most people call social media?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Another way to look at this is a back channel method of breaking down the big tech oligopoly.

I'm all for this. Kids are smart. They start using the rest of the internet. They'll become tech savvy.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 11 hours ago (6 children)

the rules are expected to apply to the likes of Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok, per the Prime Minister.

Sites used for education, including YouTube, would be exempt, as are messaging apps like WhatsApp. 

The law does not require users to upload government IDs as part of the verification process.

Sounds like a pretty weak law. It will require a birthday when creating an account and accounts under the age of 16 will be restricted/limited. As a result users (people under 16) will lie about their age.

Companies don't like this because it messes with their data collection. If they collect data that proves an account is under 16 they will be required to make them limited/restricted. However they obviously collect this data already.

I wonder if Facebook and other apps will add/push education elements in order to become exempt.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Any stonger, and they wander into China "Great Firewall" territory.

Lets not make every country into an authoritarian shithole.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago

Oh I agree. I wouldn't want a stronger law. I'm just not too concerned with this one. I think if there are concerns with social media we should discuss how to solve them for everyone.

We generally say 16-21 you are an adult so fuck it, whatever happens to you is your fault and ignore the predatory nature of organizations.

We should outline the specific concerns and determine what, if any, steps we can take.

As an example, gambling. I think it's fair and reasonable to allow gambling. I think ensuring gambling isn't predatory is a reasonable limitation. I expect for most people it isn't a problem but I think providing help to gambling addicts is also reasonable. Social media should be viewed through a similar lens.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder if Facebook and other apps will add/push education elements in order to become exempt.

I doubt it, and if they do, they'll classify a whole bunch of nonsense as educational content in order to do so, e.g. religious content as science.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 hours ago

This is going to harm kids.

[–] [email protected] 106 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

teen go to website

please enter your birthdate

1/1/2000

welcome!

[–] [email protected] 31 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Lawyer sues tech company

But we asked for the birthday

Lawyer points to law text

Company fined

[–] [email protected] 20 points 11 hours ago (7 children)

I don't see many options between asking for a birthdate and asking for ID for this problem. I don't see any way that this can be enforced that isn't problematic.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Facebook/Meta has developed software to estimate the age from a video.

I don’t see any way that this can be enforced that isn’t problematic.

Comes with the territory. The point is to control who has access to what information so that they don't get wrong ideas.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I don’t see many options between asking for a birthdate and asking for ID for this problem. I don’t see any way that this can be enforced that isn’t problematic.

The senate inquiry outlined the two likely solutions :

  1. Uploading ID to the website.

  2. 3D face scanning. This will include continual monitoring so if another person comes into view they will have to face scan in. Remember, its prohibited for chidren to even watch prohibited content with their parents.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I work tech in schools (in Australia) there are definitely tech savvy enough kids that will probably spool up their own fediverse instances

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

I know right. I used to be a kid who bypassed school firewalls and restrictions all the time. This is going to make no difference.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago (8 children)

It will likely make a big difference. Freedoms being taken away day by day and we shrug it off.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 71 points 14 hours ago (5 children)

Now everyone gets to hand over their ids to the tech companies.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

We should make a bet how long it will take before the ID databases get leaked.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 hours ago

Australia requires mobile phone providers to verify IDs before providing cell phone service. As a result, in September 2022, Optus leaked the records of 10 million Australians including passport and drivers license details.

So negative 2 years, 2 months.

But this is just asking for more.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 13 hours ago

It would take too long.

Making the bet that is, it would be leaked before you are done setting up the betting system.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 hours ago

Only for 16 seconds? Why?

[–] [email protected] 58 points 15 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago

That is both hilarious and a brilliant solution.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 13 hours ago

Okay, that is fucking awesome. LOL.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 hours ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›