this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
219 points (97.8% liked)

Linux

8203 readers
182 users here now

Welcome to c/linux!

Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.

  2. Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.

  3. Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.

  4. No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.

  5. No NSFW adult content

  6. Follow general lemmy guidelines.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Yes, I know that the ranking is not a good metric of real world use.

Just posting this because MX Linux has been in the number one spot for a long time (2 years perhaps?) and it's surprising to see some other distro on the top of their site.

https://distrowatch.com/

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

I have been using Mint for 3 years straight now. I used MXLinux for a while in the past and to be honest, it felt like a "better Debian" to me. The software from their repo list were usually more up to date and the stuff they did with XFCE really blew my mind.

At one point, I installed Cinnamon over MXLinux as an unholy mix of the two and used that for two years before committing to Mint!

MXLinux gets a lot of things correct about the desktop experience, but it still feels like you need some experience with Linux before using it. For example, one of the quirks in the XFCE desktop was that if the number of files (say 40 filea) in a folder ends up taking the full display page such that there is no , then there was empty space to right-click and get the toggle menu for the folder, then it would always select a file. So if I wanted to open a folder with elevated privileges, I'd have to fire up the terminal and navigate to the folder under root. That problem doesn't exist with Cinnamon as you can toggle the menu by clicking in some obscure corner of the window.

Similarly, some Steam games launch easily with Mint, but you may need to tweak or entirely give up on certain games.

Of course these are trivial stuff, but for a beginner / non-expert, these quality of life feature make all the difference between recommending an OS or wishing to go back to something familiar.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

It reads like a cocktail instruction, "Add mint then mix Linux"

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Funny never heard of mx linux

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (3 children)

No one has until they look at distro watch /j

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

ive been into linux for a year and a half and ive never hears of MX linux until today

[–] [email protected] 11 points 21 hours ago

You say that as a joke, but that is exactly how I figured out it exists.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 21 hours ago

I really don't think the /j is necessary.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

It's funny and awesome that the two top distro are Ubuntu remixes that remove snap.

Edit: I'm wrong. MX uses Debian as upstream, not Ubuntu, which removes any snap related tech from the picture entirely.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

What? MX Linux is a Debian remix in the style of antiX I thought?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

Shoot, you're right. I thought MX used Ubuntu as upstream but it uses Debian.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

IMO Ubuntu without Snap, but with a default Gnome or KDE (and a visual DE selector screen during installation) would be absolutely perfect.

[–] [email protected] 128 points 1 day ago (2 children)

MX Linux, the king of asking 'what's Mx linux' and inadvertently fueling its growth in distrowatch

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Save me the trouble, what is it?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 22 hours ago

Motocross Linux

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago

It's Debian with customizations, as well as some custom GUI programs for managing the system.

https://mxlinux.org/

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 day ago

Just think of it as Ubuntu with wm and no bloat

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

Look it up on distrowatch

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wonder how long it will take before it will drop off the top 10.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Somewhere between 10000 years and 5 minutes

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Windows copy dialog be like.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I really like mint although i never used it again.
Pros using mint :

  • It's easy to learn
  • It's stable
  • It's Windows XP like
  • Not recourse hogging like KDE
  • Easy to customize

Cons using mint :

  • It's debian based
[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago

Why is Debian based a problem? I ask this as my first IRL Linux user that taught me about Linux still uses Debian Unstable as his daily driver workhorse, and he is a CS Theory Doctor, and has to reboot his system once a year or so to keep it functioning properly.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not recourse hogging like KDE

KDE has been hogging no resources for ages now, it's really snappy even on not so powerful machines!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 22 hours ago

How many fucking years will we be out of KDE 4 before these yahoos figure that out?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago

Yes, unless you install some buggy stuff on top it's as snappy as xfce - tested on literally j4125 (it's GPU helps), with wobbly burning windows and everything no holdups, smol RAM usage too (especially stock).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

New to Linux, why is Debian based considerd a con?

[–] msage 4 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Very old packages.

They have security updates, but are usually held back years to ensure stability.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago

And that's a problem if stability is not one of your biggest priorities.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago

Thanks 👍

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That’s what LMDE is for :)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

That's still not Debian ;)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Debian based is alright, I'm more against it for being based on Ubuntu. Also con: apt

Not recourse hogging like KDE

Really not that bad nowadays.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

There is an official Debian-based edition of Mint: LMDE. It's what I use.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

yeah I run kde on my 12yo laptop and it's smooth

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago

Cinnamon is way more resource hogging than KDE.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I really don't like Mint. It feels like a discount version of Debian/Ubuntu to me. It makes it even worse that the person who introduced it to me has all the worst toxic traits. Now I can't see it as a good alternative.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

It's Ubuntu without Snaps and a nice DE.

Ignore people when it comes to software. Many advocate Mint. Some are lovely, some are dicks. That goes for every distro.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It might just be a matter of perspective. I'm not very knowledgeable on distros, so my opinion may come from ignorance:

To me, Ubuntu is too resource intensive with too much going on. Mint seems relatively lean yet modern, with all the basics covered. Debian is a little sparse (no sudo, no fdisk, what's going on here?).

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Who told you you can't sudo on Debian? ^^ I feel like Debian is flexible enough to give you the system you might want without the bullshit. Ubuntu has lost its way last decade, but you can still debloat it mostly and use one of its alternatives. The Cinnamon DE has improved a lot, but it still feels like Windows Vista to me.

I ended up using NixOS lately so I can have the flexibility, newer packages and very clean repeatable configuration.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Kubuntu is where it’s at.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Everyone forgets Xubuntu 🫠

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

XFCE hasn’t changed in a decade, it feels like.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 minutes ago

Just the way I like it

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›