this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
83 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

32107 readers
569 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 29 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I like the Portal reference

Unlike Google, XScreenSaver will never offer you advice, as it cannot talk. In the event that XScreenSaver does talk, we ask you to ignore it's advice. As we do with Google.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

That was meeeeeee

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's so fucking funny, dude really hates Google. XScreenSaver was released in 1992 fyi, and was once considered the pride and joy of Linux, being way cooler than other OS screensavers, and had a big community of ppl trying to make new trippy ones

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

I was surprised to learn recently that people are still making new screen savers for it.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago

Unlike Google, XScreenSaver will never run around and desert you.

Goddamnit

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

Simple. Effective. Unlike Google.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The last bullet point might be the most impactful. Google should know the rules by now.

[–] ICastFist 2 points 5 months ago

Google keeps letting us down, tho

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

inb4 jwz blocks access to his website from Lemmy

Edit: Jokes aside:

Unlike Google, XScreenSaver will never try to make WebP a thing.

Is WebP bad? If so, why?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That got me too... Webp is pretty sick actually

[–] ICastFist 3 points 5 months ago

It's created and backed by Google, so that's no doubt Jamie's main beef.

Also, when it first came out, most OSs didn't have native support, so saving a webp locally, you could only open it via a browser, or you installed a non native image viewer, not unlike jpegs and gifs during Windows 95

Side note, I personally use nomacs as my default image viewer in Win10 - https://nomacs.org/

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Toward the end it gets way more political and unhinged

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

I don't disagree with him in many aspects but I also think he's a hypocrite in many aspects so...It just led me to stop caring about whatever he does/says

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Whoaa I never expected to so see Xscreensaver mentioned in the privacy community. I've been enjoying the penrose screensaver for about five years now.

*Spends the next thirty minutes looking at all the screensavers

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

That was amazing. Wow. I mean, I knew that google was bad but, damn.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

I don't fully trust any app, and yet I think that this trend on privacy policy in app stores is pointless.

I just want to see (and tune) the sandbox options. Like, can I block this app from sending certain information to servers?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

They could just publish on F-droid. However, this person is seemingly unhinged.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

I meant only F-droid. I can't imagine Xscreensaver being that popular.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It is on f-droid too. This isnt being "unhinged" its just calling out google for their hypocrisy and pointless "privacy” policies and citing lots of examples.