this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
337 points (90.2% liked)

linuxmemes

20880 readers
8 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Xfce just works, but I wanna switch back to kde someday

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

My DE choices:

  • KDE Plasma -- It's pretty, it's customizable. Workflow is customizable
  • XFCE -- Honestly I consider XFCE to be like Plasma's sibling, in that its workflow is also very customizable and there is a lot of space for theming, but is lighter and acts nicer on weaker hardware

I tried Gnome and I just hate it? It needs a lot of fennagling to look and act in a way I find enjoyable. Cinnamon is eeeeeeeeehhhhh.

WM-wise, I played with Hyprland and I3WM, but tiling WMs aren't for me. They just aren't. For what convenience I gained from being able to use Super+something to do basically everything, I don't enjoy the workflow.

I also used Wayfire for a bit -- Writing my own configuration file and customizing everything IS fun, but like.... Nah?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I daily drive Window managers but occasionally I also check out Desktop environments. Here is my personal preference -

DE

  1. XFCE
  2. KDE
  3. Cinnamon

WM

  1. Hyprland
  2. BSPWM
  3. Openbox / Labwc
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I have never known what the difference between DE and WM, well, I still don’t know really…

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

A DE tries to be a full operating environment, it has panels and configuration tools and (...) all as part of the package

A WM only does window management, and other things need to be added separately. The line blurs a bit since most people who use WMs end up adding a lot of other stuff to them to the point it might as well be a DE, only it was built piecemeal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

So there is no DE with hyperland as WM? I want something like gnome with the forge extension but not es buggy 😂

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

None that I know of. Though you can build your own operating environment centered around Hyprland. Their wiki is pretty good and their config files are nice and simple to understand. I did that for a lark a few months back.

.... The catch is that, y'know, it's a whole afternoon spent tinkering to get it right.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well that seems promising 😃 only one day seems doable 🤟🏻🤣 I’ll try to add it to my gnome arch as second option

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

YMMV of course. It took me an afternoon to get it to a point where it had the stuff I needed and was enjoyable to use.

... f'course I didn't stick with it, as I said in my toplevel post, turns out tiling WMs aren't for me.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

If you asked source, it's "God gave me this awkward superpower, what is it for?'

If you asked sauce, idk

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Gnome on my desktop, LXQt on my laptop.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Gnome, hands now. Before coming to Linux, I was an Apple user. I was a fan of their design philosophy - minimalism, clarity and simplicity. Well, I can't tolerate Apple as an enterprise, and there are also a lot of very weird design desicions which I discovered while using their devives - but the core principle is something I stand by. Gnome in my opinion is exactly that - KISS, and all the options are really polished.

I've tried KDE as well, and have a lot of respect for the developers of it. But after using it for a few days, there are just a lot of inconsistencies in the KDE applications which don't make sense to me.

Gnome for the win!!!!!!!1!1!1!1!1!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

I'll be switching to COSMIC DE as soon as it gets into the beta phase.

[–] onlinepersona 3 points 7 months ago

Maybe because I used windows first and not Mac, but KDE. Gnome is just opensource Mac DE/WM with the same mentality "we know what's best for you and you'll like it".

Anti Commercial AI thingyCC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] ICastFist 3 points 7 months ago

XFCE with OpenSuse style is my favorite. Low resource usage, windows-easy ability to put shortcuts all over the desktop (fuck you, Unity), searchbox that just works. I don't need to spend hours or months customizing the setup for it to work as I want.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

GNOME. Also, trying to use as many apps as possible that follows its guidelines.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Good job in fitting the personalities of the DE to the girl.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

I currently use Plasma 6 on both my laptop and my desktop, but XFCE has a special place in my heart, due to it being right in the middle between being lightweight with resources and still staying usable for a buffoon like me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

@Waffelson

xfce

#linux

Since we're all here, any chance we can make a small push in the direction of having a standardized "style"/"theme" file that we can plug into the different systems?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

I switched to Niri recently, and find it much better than most of the wlroot tiling options.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

I miss my E17 and windowmaker, when I had the time to fiddle with config files...

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›