this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
910 points (98.6% liked)

Comic Strips

12785 readers
3142 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Newbies are often afraid or insulted to use “handicap” pieces

I made this mistake! I started learning Go years and years ago, and it turned out the company where I was working at that time had a former 7-dan amateur player. When he found out I was learning he offered to play me, which I eagerly accepted. I didn't know this at the time, but 7-dan amatuer is the highest Go ranking one can achieve in Japan without playing professionally (there are separate 1-dan through 9-dan ranks for pros). For our first game, he offered to give me the full 9-stone handicap since I was just starting out. I thought that sounded excessive and suggested a 6-stone handicap instead, so that's what we did. He fucking destroyed me that game. It was not even remotely close. For the rematch, I humbly accepted the full 9-stone handicap.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Did those extra three stones make enough of a difference?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well, he still won that second game but the outcome wasn't as lopsided. It definitely made the game more interesting for both of us.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

No offense, but the extra stones just made it so he could go easy on you. When I started go, the new player challenge was to end a 9 stone handicap game against the resident 3-dan with a "positive" score. [0]

[0] most official scoring methods either ignore captured stones, or count them as positive points for the player who captured them. However, when scoring by hand, it is easier to count them as negative points for the person who lost them; so thats what we did.