196

16597 readers

2116 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1174

So anyway, I'm radicalized, rule (slrpnk.net)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

181 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Is that a good thing?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Sometimes, we must face reality. Newly developed safety features are a selling point and people do pay more for safer cars. If law dictated (and enforced) that all cars must have the exact same safety features, there would be no financial incentive to develop better safety, or much less incentive at least. In reality, car safety features are one of the few examples of things actually trickling down: today's cheapest cars have safety features that at some point only existed in the most expensive luxury cars. This is fine.

None of this applies to whatever the fuck the original post is about though.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Sometimes, we must face reality.

Why would I accept a reality that I think is fucked? No I am not gonna do that.

None of this applies to whatever the fuck the original post is about though.

Yeah but side tangents are fun.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why would I accept a reality that I think is fucked? No I am not gonna do that.

I claim that this particular aspect of reality is actually fine, definitely acceptable and possibly even good. As I said, new/better car safety features do reach the cheapest models within a number years, making it a net good. Of all the things car companies do wrong, such as privacy, I really don't think this is one of them.

As for directly answering you, "Why would I accept a reality that I think is fucked?" -- I think I'm misinterpreting you when I interpret that as you basically living outside of reality. That's an option, I don't think it's a good one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

When I say accept I mean any of the first 4 definitions from Merriam Webster excluding 3c.

Of all the things car companies do wrong, such as privacy, I really don’t think this is one of them.

My problem isn't with car companies it is with capitalism just to make it clear what I am against.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Alright then :)

Thanks for being my first non-toxic conversation on Lemmy :D