this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
741 points (88.5% liked)

Personal Finance

3832 readers
13 users here now

Learn about budgeting, saving, getting out of debt, credit, investing, and retirement planning. Join our community, read the PF Wiki, and get on top of your finances!

Note: This community is not region centric, so if you are posting anything specific to a certain region, kindly specify that in the title (something like [USA], [EU], [AUS] etc.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.crimedad.work/post/12162

Why? Because apparently they need some more incentive to keep units occupied. Also, even though a property might be vacant, there's still imputed rental income there. Its owner is just receiving it in the form of enjoying the unit for himself instead of receiving an actual rent check from a tenant. That imputed rent ought to be taxed like any other income.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago (4 children)

People, collectively.

Ideally all the shitheads obsessed with "owning" get removed from the equation

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People, collectively.

But they're free to do that right now and it doesn't happen. Not on the scale we require. Asking people to donate their time to build houses just isn't a scalable solution in modern society.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

modern society.

You misspelled capitalist

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

This is a very sudden jump from "housing shouldn't be so expensive", which essentially everyone agrees with, to "we should abolish private property", which you'll find is a significantly less popular proposal.