Selfhosted

39435 readers

1 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Is anyone using Immich as a single library with multiple users? Is it even possible? (self.selfhosted)

submitted 1 year ago by Unquote0270 to c/[email protected]

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm just trying out Immich and I'm really impressed, seems to be exactly what I'm looking for except for one thing. I am looking for something that is a central library for my family so we can all access the same photos and all upload to the same place.

It looks like users can see other users' libraries but you lose the People functionality and perhaps a few other things.

What's the best solution? I'm thinking of just creating a generic user and giving the details for everyone to use but it seems a shame to lose the user functionality of individual passwords etc.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hey’ I am not sure what you are saying about the sharing library and user passwords. I’ve been using Immich with my wife just fine for a while and it’s been working well for both of us to have our own libraries and share the ones we want. Care to go into more detail on what you mean?

[–] Unquote0270 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Thanks for the reply! Basically, I don't want us to have our own libraries. I have tons of family images which Immich face-recognises and I can merge them accordingly and set up albums etc. However, when I create another user, this user can only see the photos through the Sharing page and cannot see the Faces/People tagged by the recognition, it's just a gallery of dated pictures. Presumably I will have the same experience for pictures they share.

What I want is for all users to be able to all the People (tagged by the facial recognition). With the way that sharing appears to work this wouldn't be possible if my family members were individual users so I am wondering if the only way around this is to have just one generic user login which everyone uses, that way we all get to see the People through the Explore page and can see the map for all pictures that everyone uploads.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Ahhh! That does make more sense. I’d suggest dropping in on their GitHub and disclosing this. I am not sure if this is in their roadmap as it would be interesting to share metadata that is personal to others. But I would say the “partner sharing” feature could potentially be what you are looking for. I am not sure if it is available yet. But yeah, that could be a challenge