this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
6 points (100.0% liked)
Mildly Interesting
17477 readers
61 users here now
This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.
This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?
Just post some stuff and don't spam.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
An ounce of their Dark Chocolate has 134% of the California max dose of 0.5 mg of lead, for those wondering about details.
I have half a block of this in the pantry. Thank you. Fuck me.
You can eat it just fine, just don't eat it regularly for a long time.
Am I blind or can I not find the claim about 134% on the linked page?
Searched for "Tony" there.
Well, I'm here now. What do you want?
It's the first one in the high in lead section
Duh. The page looked on my phone like the article already ended and didnt bother to scroll further down >_>
Forget everything I asked :P
I saw it on there among 20+ other chocolate bars.
Nvmd me. Didnt scroll far enough on the phone to see. Looked like the article was done already
An ounce is about 29 grams in non-freedom units, for those wondering
I've bought drugs before, I know how many grams in an ounce
Yeah, I've bought enough drugs to know it's 28g.
micrograms, which is 1/1000 of a milligram. No amount of lead is considered safe, but you would need to eat allllottttttt of this chocolate before it would get to a level that, for example, a doctor would be concerned about. Ars Technica has a good write up about the CR report
Not that I’m trying to shill for Big Chocolate. When I saw the report, I definitely made a conscious effort to cut back to once a month or less.
Ah yes, sorry, I've corrected my comment to micrograms.