this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
64 points (94.4% liked)

Games

32718 readers
1621 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Good stuff. I didn't get far in Ghosts of Tsushima because the open world felt very samey, but if they work on that I could probably try the sequel.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’m always surprised Ubisoft gets so much flak when other developers are doing much the same thing.

That said, my main annoyance with Tsushima is: You’re not a hero. 99% of side quests end with the people you were helping ending up dead, and possibly some other nameless NPCs rescued. It just feels tragic.

It’s a perpetual issue where it’s easier to code in 20 more enemies than 2 or 3 more innocent, living people to have conversations with.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Mostly because Ubisoft was the company to start this shitty trend, with everyone else being a trend chaser

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That doesn't really explain why Ubisoft got shat on for it, while Ghost of Tsushima often got praised into oblivion. I constantly found myself thinking that it could've just as well been a Ubisoft game, just with less content.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I think it’s mostly cause of the really good gameplay, rather than the open world.